ProtoVibing

The Validation Loop for Founders and Product Teams

Stop vibe-coding.Start validating.

ProtoVibing is the platform where founders and product teams run real customer-validation loops on new software products, alongside co-founders, stakeholders, and advisors, guided by AI agents and a methodology proven to work.

Beta · Invite-only

THE PROBLEM

AI made it easier than ever to build the wrong thing.

Vibe-coding tools optimize for output. They’ll happily generate a polished prototype for an idea no customer asked for. The compounding cost (wasted months, a sunk roadmap, no one who can explain why) comes due later, in the next funding round or the next planning review.

ProtoVibing flips the order. Sharpen the bet first. Talk to humans first. Write down what would falsify the idea, before you write the prompt that builds it.

The validation loop runs on speed of feedback, not comprehensiveness of preparation.

The Loop

Five phases.
An iterative loop.

01 · IDEA

Sharpen the bet.

Turn a fuzzy “what if” into a falsifiable hypothesis with a named customer and a specific problem. The Idea agent pushes back when reasoning is thin; it’s a thoughtful collaborator, not a cheerleader.

You leave with

a one-liner, a target customer profile, a hypothesis statement

02 · PLAN

Find the signal in the noise.

Adaptive market and competitive research. Scope a P0 you can actually validate this loop.

You leave with

market context, P0 scope, visual direction

03 · CREATE

Build only what you’ll test.

A disposable, frontend-only prototype scoped to the hypothesis. No premature backend, no scale plumbing.

You leave with

a working prototype that exists to be killed

04 · TEST

Talk to actual humans.

Set the go/no-go decision rule before running a single interview. Pressure-test your guide against synthetic personas. Run 8–12 customer-discovery sessions.

You leave with

a discovery guide, an experiment OKR, real transcripts

05 · SYNTHESIZE

Grade the bet, honestly.

Pattern-match real transcripts. Compare to the rule you wrote in Test. Decide: iterate, or commit.

You leave with

a synthesis doc, a graded hypothesis, a decision

BETWEEN LOOPS

One loop is rarely enough.

Each loop dehydrates into a chip, learnings flow forward through bridge connectors, and Loop 2 starts pre-seeded with everything Loop 1 discovered.

THE DECISION

Every loop ends with a written decision.

Iterate (with a refined hypothesis), or commit (with the artifacts to ship). No rationalizing the result post-hoc; the decision rule was set before you ran the test.

THE OUTCOME

When you finally build, you build on bedrock.

By the time a ProtoVibing loop closes, you have artifacts that won’t move under you: a one-liner that survived customer pressure, an ICP grounded in real interviews, a hypothesis with explicit test sentence, transcripts and patterns from the field, a written go/no-go that was set before testing began. That’s the position to build from. That’s what makes the next six months feel like execution instead of guesswork.

ONE-LINER

Survived customer pressure

ICP DOC

Grounded in real interviews

HYPOTHESIS

With explicit test sentence

TRANSCRIPTS

Patterns from the field

DECISION

Set before testing began

THE HANDOFF

Your validated learning becomes the repo your build answers to.

Close a loop and ProtoVibing syncs every confirmed document into a GitHub repo you own. It arrives as an AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md your coding agent reads before it writes a line, next to the full dossier and one folder per loop. The industry has started calling this a project constitution. Without one, a build drifts back to the assumptions your loops were built to kill.

See how the handoff works
your-project
  • README.mdThe full dossier in one file
  • AGENTS.mdThe build constitution
  • CLAUDE.mdSame guide, read by Claude Code
  • product/Overview, persona, hypothesis
  • spec/Requirements, design, journey map
  • market/Research and competitive analysis
  • build/Builder prompts, OKRs, test results
  • loops/
  • loop-1/synthesis/Recap, findings, iteration brief
  • loop-2/synthesis/

NOT ALONE

Validation nobody witnessed is just a story you told yourself.

Invite co-founders, advisors, stakeholders, and design partners directly onto the canvas. They comment on specific nodes, not generic threads, so feedback lands in context. Advisors and sponsors can sign-off (or block) phase advancement. They catch up on a project in 10 minutes from a link, not a Zoom briefing.

I spent three months validating in Claude and had nothing to show my co-founder except a folder of chat logs. ProtoVibing changed that. I shared a link and she was caught up in 10 minutes.

Design Partner

WHO’S RUN IT

Founders and product leaders. Real validation loops.

ProtoVibing was truly transformative, with exceptional ROI. In a short time I gained more clarity, structure, and momentum than I'd built in months of working alone. The targeted guidance and proven frameworks saved me countless hours and gave me a confident, impactful path forward.

Rachel G.

Principal CX Manager at Microsoft

ProtoVibing helped us focus on customer discovery and validation before building anything. We refined our ICP, mapped user journeys, and validated pain points early instead of jumping into code. The customer insights we gathered transformed how we understood our market. This process delivered immediate clarity on product-market fit.

Greg K.

CTO at Cogzia

The ProtoVibing approach to customer discovery was eye-opening. It guided me through systematic validation of my business idea using customer interviews and user research methodologies I'd never applied before. Instead of building based on assumptions, I learned to validate pain points with real customers first.

Diana S.

Founder at Safe Players

Before discovering ProtoVibing, I had ideas but no systematic way to validate them with customers. Now I understand how to conduct proper customer discovery, validate pain points, and test assumptions before building features. I strongly recommend this to anyone who wants to validate product-market fit.

WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE

One workspace. Every loop. Every artifact.

Demo state · loop1-decision

When a loop completes, the decision point appears in your workspace. Iterate or commit, with your full validation history one click away.

Demo state · loop2-in-progress

Loop 2 starts where Loop 1 left off. Insights flow forward through bridge connectors, not buried in chat logs.

Demo state · three-loops-done

Every loop, every artifact, every advisor comment. One workspace, scroll back to the moment a hypothesis got disproven.

FREE STANDALONE AGENTS

Want to start before you’re a Design Partner?

These free standalone agents run inside Claude or ChatGPT. They don’t coordinate the way the platform does, but they’ll move you forward today.

See all 10 free agents →

These give you a taste. The platform wires them all together, and adds your team and your customers.

ACCESS

The platform is in beta. Here's what's inside.

ProtoVibing runs on two components: per-seat access to the platform and agent suite, and usage credits for AI-assisted loop work. Exact pricing is shared during onboarding. We're calibrating the model with our early design partners.

Practitioner

Solo founders and individual PMs, early exploration

Access the methodology, practice the prompts in plain Claude or ChatGPT, and get notified when early access opens.

  • Full methodology guide
  • Practice prompts for every phase
  • Free standalone agents
  • Early access waitlist priority
Join the waitlist

Design Partner

Early design partners

A curated group of founders and product teams running real validation loops inside the platform, guided by the full agent suite, with advisor oversight baked in.

  • Full agent suite (Idea → Synthesize)
  • Advisor dashboard + witness layer
  • Per-seat access + usage credits
  • Direct feedback loop with the ProtoVibing team
Apply for access

Team

Founding teams and product teams

Shared workspace for co-founders, PMs, designers, and engineers running loops together, with team-level advisor and stakeholder visibility.

  • Everything in Design Partner
  • Shared workspace for up to 4 seats
  • Team-level advisor dashboard
  • Per-seat + shared usage credits
Apply for access

Pricing details are shared during onboarding. We're building the right model with our first design partners.

SERVICES

Go deeper with guided work.

The platform is the self-serve path. These are the hands-on options.

CONSULTING

5-Day ProtoVibing Challenge

A 1:1 consulting engagement with Marc. Over five days, one session per phase, he walks you through a complete ProtoVibing loop (Idea through Synthesize) as a hands-on collaborator, not a coach watching from the sideline. You leave with a fully executed loop, a written iterate-or-commit decision, and a grounded working knowledge of the methodology you can apply independently on every loop that follows.

  • 5 live sessions · one per phase
  • Real hypothesis, real customer interviews
  • Written decision doc at close
  • Carry-forward artifacts for Loop 2
Apply via assessment

WORKSHOPS

Learn the methodology with a group.

ProtoVibing consulting workshops run as public events, structured cohorts, and private sessions for accelerators, founding teams, and product orgs. All formats are hands-on: you leave with a sharpened hypothesis and the muscle memory to run the next loop yourself.

  • Public events via Luma
  • Cohort programs via Maven
  • Custom & enterprise
See workshop formats

WHO BUILT THIS

Built from real validation work, not theory.

Marc Krejci has spent over twenty years shipping software products, including 7.5 years leading design for AI, VR, and ML-driven experiences at Meta. He developed the ProtoVibing methodology through direct work with more than 200 early-stage founders, building a system to interrupt the failure patterns he kept seeing repeat.

200+

Founders coached

20+

Years shipping

8

Ventures founded

APPLY

Apply for access. Take the diagnostic while you do it.

Drop your email and stage and you’re on the list. Continue into the validation-readiness diagnostic for a scored result, a recommended starting phase, and consideration for design-partner access.

APPLY

Know where you stand before you build.

Drop your email to hold your spot. Take the seven-question diagnostic for a scored readiness report, a recommended starting phase, and consideration for a direct working session with the team.

  • Your place on the list secured at step one
  • A scored readiness report and recommended starting phase
  • Reviewed personally for design-partner consideration

FAQ

Common questions.

What’s a Design Partner vs. the waitlist?

Design Partners get hands-on access during the beta: direct 1:1 time with the Pathfinder Foundry team, early platform access, and influence over the methodology. Waitlist signups stay in the loop for the eventual public launch. It’s the same form: drop your email and your stage and stop, or continue into the seven-question diagnostic to be considered for the current design-partner beta.

Why is ProtoVibing different from Lovable / Bolt / v0 / Cursor?

Those tools optimize for output. ProtoVibing optimizes for the validity of the bet you’re betting on. We force a falsifiable hypothesis, a named customer, and a written go/no-go decision rule before the first prompt. The prototype gets built only to test something specific, never as the goal itself.

Do I need to be technical?

No. The Create phase produces a frontend-only prototype using AI tools you already use; people who can already code move faster, but the methodology doesn’t require coding skill. Validation rigor is what compounds, not raw build velocity.

Does this work inside a company, or is it only for startups?

It works in both, and the loop is identical. What changes is who witnesses it. A founder brings co-founders and advisors; a product team brings its design partner, its engineering lead, and whoever signs off on the roadmap. The decision rule does the same job in either place: it gets written before the interviews so the result can’t be re-argued afterward. Teams inside companies usually have easier access to customers and a harder time getting permission to kill an idea. The written go/no-go is what makes that second conversation short.

What does the methodology assume I have already?

An idea you can articulate in a sentence and a few hours a week to commit. That’s the floor. If you don’t have an idea yet, the Idea phase is built to help you sharpen one, but we’re not in the business of generating ideas for people who don’t have them.

How long does one loop take?

A loop moves as fast as you have time to move through it. With AI-assisted tools accelerating every phase except one, a committed team can compress Idea through Create into days. The bottleneck is almost always the Test phase: scheduling and completing real customer interviews takes as long as it takes. That is not a flaw in the methodology. It is the point. The fastest possible loop is one where the interviews are done, not skipped.

What do I actually walk away with when a loop closes?

A GitHub repo you own. Every document you confirmed during the loop is synced there: the combined dossier at the root, the product, spec, market, and build sections as individual files, and one folder per loop holding that loop's synthesis. Each closed loop arrives as its own pull request, so your validation history reads back as commit history. Today the repo carries validation documents rather than runnable code, which is the point. It is the foundation the real build answers to.

Does the repo work with Claude Code and Cursor?

Yes, and this is the part most people don't expect. Agentic build tools look for a root AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md to ground themselves before they start writing. ProtoVibing writes both, containing what the industry is starting to call a project constitution: the decisions and requirements that were actually tested with customers. Point Claude Code at the repo and it reads your validated learning first, then builds against it, instead of reintroducing the assumptions your loops were designed to kill.

What happens to my data and my interviews?

Your project, transcripts, and artifacts stay private to you and the people you explicitly invite. We don’t train models on your work. Service-role access is reserved for product operations only.

When does it open beyond design partners?

After our early design partners close a full validation loop and we’re confident the experience holds up. Everyone on the list gets notified, in order of join date.